Evolve Cima 2026 geometry

A size-by-size geometry profile with manufacturer provenance and RideDNA consistency-audit context. Use the complete table to compare fit and handling before opening the interactive tools.

Evolve Cima 2026 geometry chart

Source: Manufacturer geometry source

Published geometry by size

Provenance: published is present in the manufacturer data; derived is calculated by RideDNA; manual is a staff-entered reference rather than a manufacturer-chart value. “Not published” means the manufacturer did not provide a value for that size.

SizeStackReachHTASTAETTChainstayWheelbaseFront centerBB dropTrailFork offsetAudit context
L 580 mm published397 mm published73.8 ° derived73.5 ° derived569 mm derived410 mm derived991 mm published591 mm published70 mm derived57.0 mm published40 mm published yellow
1 of 5 checks flagged — Stack Reconciliation shows 2.1mm discrepancy
M 544 mm published384 mm published73.0 ° derived74.0 ° derived540 mm derived410 mm derived978 mm published579 mm published72 mm derived58.0 mm published44 mm published yellow
1 of 5 checks flagged — Stack Reconciliation shows 2.9mm discrepancy
ML 562 mm published390 mm published73.8 ° derived74.0 ° derived551 mm derived410 mm derived978 mm published579 mm published72 mm derived57.0 mm published40 mm published yellow
1 of 5 checks flagged — Stack Reconciliation shows 2.9mm discrepancy
S 528 mm published378 mm published72.2 ° derived75.0 ° derived519 mm derived410 mm derived973 mm published573 mm published74 mm derived63.0 mm published44 mm published yellow
1 of 5 checks flagged — Stack Reconciliation shows 2.9mm discrepancy
XL 608 mm published406 mm published73.8 ° derived73.5 ° derived586 mm derived410 mm derived1008 mm published608 mm published70 mm derived57.0 mm published40 mm published yellow
1 of 5 checks flagged — Stack Reconciliation shows 3mm discrepancy
XS 506 mm published371 mm published71.1 ° derived75.0 ° derived507 mm derived410 mm derived969 mm published571 mm published74 mm derived70.0 mm published44 mm published yellow
1 of 5 checks flagged — Stack Reconciliation shows 3.1mm discrepancy

Audit context

Overall consistency: yellow. This context is shown alongside the table so a rider can distinguish a complete published specification from a value that RideDNA had to derive or could not independently verify.

The Evolve Cima geometry audit shows systematic stack discrepancies of 2.1–3.1mm across all six sizes, while reach, wheelbase, front center, and trail reconcile within ±1mm engineering tolerance. The stack pattern indicates a data inaccuracy in either the published stack values or the published head tube length values — the root cause cannot be determined from the published geometry data alone. The RideDNA Geometry Engine reconciliation analysis reveals that the published stack values appear deflated by approximately 3.0mm relative to what the other published geometry parameters imply, with this residual appearing consistently in both the head tube length and fork A2C back-calculations.

Next steps

More Evolve geometry profiles