Ranked by Euclidean distance across stack, reach, head-tube angle, mechanical trail, chainstay length, wheelbase, and bottom-bracket drop — all z-scaled so no metric dominates.
| Stack | 557 mm | Reach | 392 mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head-tube angle | 72.3 ° | Trail | 63.0 mm |
| Chainstay | 410 mm | Wheelbase | 997 mm |
| BB drop | 69 mm | Type | Road |
| # | Bike | Δ | Stack | Reach | HTA | Trail | WB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scott Addict RC 2026 | 2.12 | 543 mm | 395 mm | 72.8 ° | 59.5 mm | 991 mm |
| 2 | Lauf Uthald 2026 | 2.40 | 564 mm | 389 mm | 71.5 ° | 64.0 mm | 1003 mm |
| 3 | BMC RoadMachine 2026 | 2.92 | 582 mm | 388 mm | 72.2 ° | 63.0 mm | 1008 mm |
| 4 | Cervelo Caledonia 2026 | 2.95 | 568 mm | 383 mm | 72.0 ° | 60.0 mm | 1004 mm |
| 5 | Pinarello Dogma F 2026 | 3.12 | 544 mm | 388 mm | 72.8 ° | 55.7 mm | 985 mm |
| 6 | Winspace T1500 2026 | 3.22 | 534 mm | 381 mm | 72.0 ° | 60.3 mm | 979 mm |
| 7 | Pinarello Dogma X 2026 | 3.24 | 558 mm | 386 mm | 72.0 ° | 62.0 mm | 1000 mm |
| 8 | Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2026 | 3.24 | 539 mm | 385 mm | 71.2 ° | 58.0 mm | 998 mm |
Across the 8 closest matches in the catalog the BMC TeamMachine 2026 fits a recognisable cluster of Road bikes. The neighbour set was selected only from the same bike-type bucket and only from models for which we have a full stack/reach/HTA/trail/chainstay/wheelbase/BB-drop record — so the distance numbers above are like-for-like, not apples-to-oranges.
The single closest geometric match is the Scott Addict RC 2026, with a normalised distance of 13.7 mm of stack and 3.1 mm of reach separating the two. Riders who liked the position of one will almost always feel at home on the other.
BMC TeamMachine 2026 runs about 3.0 mm more stack than the median of its closest neighbours, so this is the more upright pick of the cluster — better for endurance fits, riders with limited hip flexion, and anyone who wants the bars high without an enormous spacer stack.
BMC TeamMachine 2026 runs about 5.0 mm more reach than the median of its closest neighbours, so the cockpit is longer than its peers, which usually pairs well with a shorter stem and suits taller torsos.
BMC TeamMachine 2026 runs about 2.7 mm more trail than the median of its closest neighbours, so the steering is calmer and more self-centring than its peers — better for descents, loaded riding, and high-speed gravel.
Use the side-by-side comparison links below to drill in on any specific pairing. Every comparison page on RideDNA is computed from the same audited geometry tables that power this list, so the numbers will be internally consistent. If you'd rather start from your existing fit, the Fit Wizard takes a few of your current bike's measurements and re-runs this same nearest-neighbour search from your seat, not from a brand the manufacturer chose to compete with.
Method. Each of the seven metrics is z-scaled by its standard deviation across the candidate pool before being summed in the Euclidean norm. This avoids wheelbase (typically ±50 mm of variation) drowning out HTA (±2° of variation). We deliberately do not include subjective scores in this similarity calculation — the goal is geometric kinship, not handling kinship. Two bikes that share geometry but pair it with very different fork offsets or tyre clearances can still feel different on the trail; the Handling Index page is the better tool for that question.