Ridley Kanzo Adventure 2026 geometry

A size-by-size geometry profile with manufacturer provenance and RideDNA consistency-audit context. Use the complete table to compare fit and handling before opening the interactive tools.

Ridley Kanzo Adventure 2026 geometry chart

Source: Manufacturer geometry source

Published geometry by size

Provenance: published is present in the manufacturer data; derived is calculated by RideDNA; manual is a staff-entered reference rather than a manufacturer-chart value. “Not published” means the manufacturer did not provide a value for that size.

SizeStackReachHTASTAETTChainstayWheelbaseFront centerBB dropTrailFork offsetAudit context
L 617 mm published415 mm published70.5 ° derived74.0 ° derived592 mm derived435 mm derived1088 mm published664 mm derived75 mm derived75.0 mm derived50 mm derived green
All 3 consistency checks passed
M 591 mm published401 mm published70.5 ° derived74.0 ° derived570 mm derived435 mm derived1065 mm published641 mm derived75 mm derived75.0 mm derived50 mm derived green
All 3 consistency checks passed
S 569 mm published387 mm published70.8 ° derived74.0 ° derived550 mm derived435 mm derived1041 mm published616 mm derived75 mm derived73.0 mm derived50 mm derived green
All 3 consistency checks passed
XL 639 mm published426 mm published70.5 ° derived73.5 ° derived615 mm derived435 mm derived1107 mm published682 mm derived75 mm derived75.0 mm derived50 mm derived green
All 3 consistency checks passed
XS 546 mm published379 mm published70.8 ° derived74.5 ° derived530 mm derived435 mm derived1024 mm published600 mm derived75 mm derived73.0 mm derived50 mm derived green
All 3 consistency checks passed

Audit context

Overall consistency: green. This context is shown alongside the table so a rider can distinguish a complete published specification from a value that RideDNA had to derive or could not independently verify.

The Ridley Kanzo Adventure geometry specification reconciles within ±1mm engineering tolerance across all five sizes for stack, reach, and wheelbase. The forward model used Effective Top Tube (ETT) as the geometry anchor to establish BB horizontal position, with reach and wheelbase independently computed from this ETT-anchored position. The manufacturer has not published fork axle-to-crown length or fork offset, which prevented independent calculation of stack, reach, and wheelbase — all such checks are trivial passes reflecting the engine carrying through published values rather than independent geometric verification. An accurate and complete geometry specification from the manufacturer — including fork axle-to-crown length and fork offset — would provide greater clarity and enable full independent geometric verification.

Next steps

More Ridley geometry profiles