Ranked by Euclidean distance across stack, reach, head-tube angle, mechanical trail, chainstay length, wheelbase, and bottom-bracket drop — all z-scaled so no metric dominates.
| Stack | 550 mm | Reach | 386 mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head-tube angle | 71.5 ° | Trail | 58.7 mm |
| Chainstay | 425 mm | Wheelbase | 1023 mm |
| BB drop | 63 mm | Type | Gravel |
| # | Bike | Δ | Stack | Reach | HTA | Trail | WB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cannondale SuperX 2026 | 1.84 | 564 mm | 382 mm | 71.0 ° | 65.0 mm | 1027 mm |
| 2 | Scott Addict Gravel RC 2026 | 2.12 | 565 mm | 387 mm | 71.0 ° | 64.5 mm | 1029 mm |
| 3 | Specialized Crux 2026 | 2.43 | 569 mm | 393 mm | 71.8 ° | 65.5 mm | 1028 mm |
| 4 | Pinarello Dogma GR 2026 | 2.43 | 566 mm | 384 mm | 71.0 ° | 68.0 mm | 1026 mm |
| 5 | Lauf Seigla 2026 | 2.47 | 565 mm | 388 mm | 70.5 ° | 78.0 mm | 1035 mm |
| 6 | Pinarello Grevil F 2026 | 2.54 | 580 mm | 393 mm | 71.3 ° | 65.4 mm | 1048 mm |
| 7 | Litespeed ULTIMATE G2 2026 | 2.66 | 571 mm | 392 mm | 71.5 ° | 68.1 mm | 1031 mm |
| 8 | Cervelo Aspero 2026 | 3.10 | 568 mm | 393 mm | 72.0 ° | 62.0 mm | 1019 mm |
Across the 8 closest matches in the catalog the Cervelo R5-CX 2026 fits a recognisable cluster of Gravel bikes. The neighbour set was selected only from the same bike-type bucket and only from models for which we have a full stack/reach/HTA/trail/chainstay/wheelbase/BB-drop record — so the distance numbers above are like-for-like, not apples-to-oranges.
The single closest geometric match is the Cannondale SuperX 2026, with a normalised distance of 13.9 mm of stack and 3.7 mm of reach separating the two. Riders who liked the position of one will almost always feel at home on the other.
Cervelo R5-CX 2026 runs about 18.4 mm less stack than the median of its closest neighbours, so this is the more aggressive pick of the cluster — better for race fits, lower bar drops, and riders who want their stem closer to the steerer-tube cap.
Cervelo R5-CX 2026 runs about 3.5 mm less reach than the median of its closest neighbours, so the cockpit is shorter than its peers, which packs the rider over the bottom bracket and suits classic stem lengths.
Cervelo R5-CX 2026 runs about 8.4 mm less trail than the median of its closest neighbours, so the steering is lighter and more responsive than its peers — better for technical handling, crit corners, and trials-style movement.
Use the side-by-side comparison links below to drill in on any specific pairing. Every comparison page on RideDNA is computed from the same audited geometry tables that power this list, so the numbers will be internally consistent. If you'd rather start from your existing fit, the Fit Wizard takes a few of your current bike's measurements and re-runs this same nearest-neighbour search from your seat, not from a brand the manufacturer chose to compete with.
Method. Each of the seven metrics is z-scaled by its standard deviation across the candidate pool before being summed in the Euclidean norm. This avoids wheelbase (typically ±50 mm of variation) drowning out HTA (±2° of variation). We deliberately do not include subjective scores in this similarity calculation — the goal is geometric kinship, not handling kinship. Two bikes that share geometry but pair it with very different fork offsets or tyre clearances can still feel different on the trail; the Handling Index page is the better tool for that question.