A size-by-size geometry profile with manufacturer provenance and RideDNA consistency-audit context. Use the complete table to compare fit and handling before opening the interactive tools.
Source: Manufacturer geometry source
Provenance: published is present in the manufacturer data; derived is calculated by RideDNA; manual is a staff-entered reference rather than a manufacturer-chart value. “Not published” means the manufacturer did not provide a value for that size.
| Size | Stack | Reach | HTA | STA | ETT | Chainstay | Wheelbase | Front center | BB drop | Trail | Fork offset | Audit context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | 625 mm published | 385 mm published | 72.0 ° derived | 73.5 ° derived | 570 mm derived | 430 mm derived | 1042 mm published | 622 mm published | 71 mm derived | 60.0 mm published | 50 mm published | green |
| All 5 consistency checks passed | ||||||||||||
| M | 575 mm published | 375 mm published | 71.0 ° derived | 74.5 ° derived | 534 mm derived | 430 mm derived | 1024 mm published | 604 mm published | 71 mm derived | 67.0 mm published | 50 mm published | red |
| 1 of 5 checks flagged — Stack Reconciliation shows 5.2mm discrepancy | ||||||||||||
| M/L | 600 mm published | 380 mm published | 71.5 ° derived | 74.0 ° derived | 552 mm derived | 430 mm derived | 1034 mm published | 614 mm published | 71 mm derived | 63.0 mm published | 50 mm published | green |
| All 5 consistency checks passed | ||||||||||||
| S | 550 mm published | 370 mm published | 71.0 ° derived | 74.5 ° derived | 523 mm derived | 430 mm derived | 1009 mm published | 591 mm published | 76 mm derived | 67.0 mm published | 50 mm published | green |
| All 5 consistency checks passed | ||||||||||||
| XL | 650 mm published | 390 mm published | 72.0 ° derived | 73.0 ° derived | 589 mm derived | 430 mm derived | 1057 mm published | 636 mm published | 66 mm derived | 60.0 mm published | 50 mm published | green |
| All 5 consistency checks passed | ||||||||||||
Overall consistency: red. This context is shown alongside the table so a rider can distinguish a complete published specification from a value that RideDNA had to derive or could not independently verify.
The Litespeed Cherohala geometry specification reconciles within ±1mm engineering tolerance across all checks on four of five sizes (S, M/L, L, XL). Size M shows a 5.2mm significant data inaccuracy in the published stack value — all other metrics on size M reconcile within tolerance, isolating the discrepancy to stack alone. The RideDNA Geometry Engine reconciliation confirms this pattern: the published stack value on size M is inflated by approximately 5.5mm relative to what the other published geometry parameters (head tube length, head tube angle, fork A2C) imply, while all other sizes show internal geometric consistency.